Hard and Soft decision decoding

Consider a simple even parity encoder given below.

Input Bit 1	Input Bit 2	Parity bit added by encoder	Codeword Generated
0	0	0	000
0	1	1	011
1	0	1	101
1	1	0	110

The set of all possible codewords generated by the encoder are 000,011,101 and 110.

Lets say we are want to transmit the message "01" through a communication channel.

Hard decision decoding :
Case 1 : Assume that our communication model consists of a parity encoder, communication channel (attenuates the data randomly) and a hard decision decoder

The message bits "01" are applied to the parity encoder and we get "011" as the output codeword.


The output codeword "011" is transmitted through the channel. "0" is transmitted as "0 Volt and "1" as "1 Volt". The channelattenuates the signal that is being transmitted and the receiver sees a distorted waveform ( "Red color waveform"). The hard decision decoder makes a decision based on the threshold voltage. In our case the threshold voltage is chosen as 0.5 Volt ( midway between "0" and "1" Volt ) . At each sampling instant in the receiver (as shown in the figure above) the hard decisiondetector determines the state of the bit to be "0" if the voltage level falls below the threshold and "1" if the voltage level is above the threshold. Therefore, the output of the hard decision block is "001". Perhaps this "001" output is not a valid codeword ( compare this with the all possible codewords given in the table above) , which implies that the message bits cannot be recovered properly. The decoder compares the output of the hard decision block with the all possible codewords and computes the minimum Hamming distance for each case (as illustrated in the table below).

All possible Codewords	Hard decision output	Hamming distance
000	001	1
011	001	1
101	001	1
110	001	3

The decoder's job is to choose a valid codeword which has the minimum Hamming distance. In our case, the minimumHamming distance is "1" and there are 3 valid codewords with this distance. The decoder may choose any of the three possibility and the probability of getting the correct codeword ("001" - this is what we transmitted) is always 1/3. So when the hard decision decoding is employed the probability of recovering our data ( in this particular case) is 1/3. Lets see what "Soft decision decoding" offers ...

Soft Decision Decoding

The difference between hard and soft decision decoder is as follows

• In Hard decision decoding, the received codeword is compared with the all possible codewords and the codeword which gives the minimum Hamming distance is selected
• In Soft decision decoding, the received codeword is compared with the all possible codewords and the codeword which gives the minimum Euclidean distance is selected. Thus the soft decision decoding improves the decision making process by supplying additional reliability information ( calculated Euclidean distance or calculated log-likelihood ratio)

Voltage levels of the received signal at each sampling instant are shown in the figure. The soft decision block calculates the Euclidean distance between the received signal and the all possible codewords.

Valid codewords	Voltage levels at each sampling instant of received waveform	Euclidean distance calculation	Euclidean distance
0 0 0 ( 0V 0V 0V )	0.2V 0.4V 0.7V	(0-0.2)2+ (0-0.4)2+ (0-0.7)2	0.69
0 1 1 ( 0V 1V 1V )	0.2V 0.4V 0.7V	(0-0.2)2+ (1-0.4)2+ (1-0.7)2	0.49
1 0 1 ( 1V 0V 1V )	0.2V 0.4V 0.7V	(1-0.2)2+ (0-0.4)2+ (1-0.7)2	0.89
1 1 0 ( 1V 1V 0V )	0.2V 0.4V 0.7V	(1-0.2)2+ (1-0.4)2+ (0-0.7)2	1.49

The minimum Euclidean distance is "0.49" corresponding to "0 1 1" codeword (which is what we transmitted). The decoder selects this codeword as the output. Even though the parity encoder cannot correct errors, the soft decision scheme helped in recovering the data in this case.